Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GVOX
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:31, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- GVOX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, fails notability requirements, fails WP:V also seems to be WP:Promotion as well. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed with nom. Fails GNG, poor refs. South Nashua (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 03:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 03:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Strong delete As per nominator.Celestina007 (talk) 22:25, 04 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.